Question 11. Question. Concurrent validity is studied when one test is proposed as a substitute for another (for example, when a multiple-choice form of spelling test is substituted for taking dictation), or a test is shown to correlate with some contemporary criterion (e.g., psychiatric diagnosis). For example, Criterion validity (concurrent and predictive validity) There are many occasions when you might choose to use a well-established measurement procedure (e.g., a 42-item survey on depression) as the basis to create a new measurement procedure (e.g., a 19-item survey on depression) to measure the construct you are interested in (e.g., depression, sleep quality, employee commitment, etc. Concurrent validity: This occurs when criterion measures are obtained at the same time as test scores, indicating the ability of test scores in estimating an individual’s current For example, on a test that measures levels of depression, the test would be said to have concurrent validity if it measured the current levels of depression experienced by the test taker. ). Concurrent Validity In concurrent validity , we assess the operationalization’s ability to distinguish between groups that it should theoretically be able to distinguish between . Observer bias. Validity in Sociology. inter-interviewer reliability. Inter-observer reliability. Construct validity is "the degree to which a test measures what it claims, or purports, to be measuring." _____ is the type of validity that examines how well a test outcome is consistent with a criterion that occurs in the present. Unlike predictive validity, where the second measurement occurs later, concurrent validity requires a second measure at about the same time. Question. Revised on June 19, 2020. is a good example of a concurrent validity study. The important thing to recognize is that they work together – if you can demonstrate that you have evidence for both convergent and discriminant validity, then you’ve by definition demonstrated that you have evidence for construct validity. In quantitative research, you have to consider the reliability and validity of your methods and measurements.. Validity tells you how accurately a method measures something. The four types of validity. Divergent Validity – When two opposite questions reveal opposite results. face validity. When what someone observes is influenced by their expectations. Concurrent validity. Convergent Validity – When two similar questions reveal the same result. Answer. Convergent and discriminant validity are both considered subcategories or subtypes of construct validity. The concurrent method involves administering two measures, the test and a second measure of the attribute, to the same group of individuals at as close to the same point in time as possible. concurrent validity. Concurrent validity compares scores on an instrument with current performance on some other measure. MInd yer own business. In the classical model of test validity, construct validity is one of three main types of validity evidence, alongside content validity and criterion validity. Question 12. A)content validity B)predictive validity C)concurrent criterion validity D)test-retest validity Published on September 6, 2019 by Fiona Middleton. Testing for this type of validity requires that you essentially ask your sample similar questions that are designed to … Validity in Sociology: Reliability in Research - ThoughtCo.